58 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
4
15
5
29
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
12.0
9.0
2.2
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
111
226
63
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
83%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
87%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.