57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
4
18
4
3
28
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
12.0
3.7
2.3
2.2
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
111
36
68
63
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen