56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Hankook Ventus Prime 4 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
3
18
10
13
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#2
#1
#2
#2
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
3.3
6.1
6.0
6.2
12.0
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2026
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
40
47
104
530
111
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich