Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

GoodYear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Turanza 6

e.Primacy

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

1

3

18

13

4

3

5

Optimale Position

#12

#2

#1

#2

#3

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

3.3

6.1

6.2

12.0

4.7

2.2

Neuester Test

2018

2026

2024

2026

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

60

40

47

225

111

126

63

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

74%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Michelin Primacy 5

58%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Michelin Primacy 5

51%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

71%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

51%

Michelin Primacy 5

1%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Michelin Primacy 5

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Michelin Primacy 5

63%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Bridgestone Turanza 6

70%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza 6 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Multihawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

Turanza 6

e.Primacy

Primacy 5

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen