Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Anzahl der Tests

1

16

4

3

18

3

2

Optimale Position

#12

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

5.5

12.0

3.3

6.1

3.7

1.0

Neuester Test

2018

2023

2025

2026

2024

2025

Verfügbare Größen

60

153

111

40

47

34

23

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Ziex

UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Nass

Komfort

Trocken

Kosten

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen