56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
3
18
26
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
3.3
6.1
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2026
2024
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
40
47
66
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich