57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Pirelli
Cinturato P7 C2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
18
9
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
6.1
5.8
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
47
92
36
40

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
85%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen