56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Firestone Roadhawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
18
1
6
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#1
#1
#3
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
6.1
1.0
4.7
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
47
64
146
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich