57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
3
6
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#2
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
3.7
4.7
3.3
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
36
146
40
66
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen