56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Michelin
e.Primacy
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
26
18
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
12.0
2.2
6.1
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2026
2024
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
111
66
47
34
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich