Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Anzahl der Tests

1

16

15

3

5

Optimale Position

#12

#3

#2

#1

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

5.5

9.0

3.3

3.7

2.2

Neuester Test

2018

2023

2025

2026

2025

Verfügbare Größen

60

153

225

40

34

63

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

86%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Lenkreaktion - trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Innengeräusche

Firestone Multihawk 2

89%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Kumho Ecsta PS71 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance

Ecsta PS71

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen