56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
1
3
3
18
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
1.0
3.3
4.7
6.1
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
64
40
126
47
40
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich