56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental SportContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
4
18
3
15
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#3
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
12.0
6.1
3.7
1.2
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2025
2024
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
111
47
34
122

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich