57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
10
4
5
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#2
#3
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
6.0
12.0
2.2
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
109
111
63
36

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich