57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
10
4
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
6.0
12.0
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
109
111
36
66

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen