56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
18
4
1
2
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
6.1
12.0
1.0
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
47
111
64
23

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich