57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 6 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
4
36
11
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.3
3.1
11.6
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2026
2023
2024
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
40
303
122

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
89%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
74%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen