57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
5
3
18
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
2.2
1.3
6.1
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2026
2024
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
63
23
47
40
36
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
93%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental UltraContact NXT
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental UltraContact NXT
91%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich