57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin Primacy 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 5
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
4
1
5
5
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#3
#1
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
12.0
1.0
2.2
4.8
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
111
66
63
158

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich