56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
4
1
5
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
12.0
1.0
2.2
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2025
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
111
64
63
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich