57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
10
4
4
1
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#3
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
6.0
12.0
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
109
111
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich