57 · Produkte}
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kleber Dynaxer HP4 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip PerformancePremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance

3.8
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Kleber Dynaxer HP4Obere-Mittelklasse
KleberKleber

Dynaxer HP4

6.7
R14 – R17
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.8
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4Premium
PirelliPirelli

P ZERO PZ4

9.1
R13 – R23
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 UltraContact NXT Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kleber
Dynaxer HP4
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
11
4
1
14
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
11.6
3.3
1.0
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2024
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
122
40
66
700

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Rankings entdecken

Beste -Reifen für ElektrofahrzeugeBeste Trockenhandling reifenBeste RegenreifenReifen mit bestem HandlingDie Leisesten reifenDie günstigsten reifenBeste Anti-Aquaplaning-reifen

Beliebte Reifenvergleiche

VS
Continental PremiumContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental AllSeasonContact vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Michelin Primacy 4
VS
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Pirelli P ZERO
VS
Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs Continental PremiumContact 6
VS
Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
VS
Continental WinterContact TS 870 vs Michelin ALPIN 6
VS
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71

Auch vergleichen

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs BFGoodrich AdvantageFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Barum Bravuris 5 HMFirestone Multihawk 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Continental UltraContactGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Dunlop Sport BluResponseGoodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Cooper ZEON CS8Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs Kleber Dynaxer HP5Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

Nach Marke durchsuchen

PirelliHankookMichelinGoodyearFalkenNokianVredesteinContinentalKumhoNexenBridgestoneDunlop

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen