57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
5
3
4
1
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
2.8
3.7
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
139
36
40
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich