56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
3
13
3
2
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
3.3
4.3
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
40
123
34
23

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich