56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental UltraContact NXT

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
3
4
1
2
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#2
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
3.3
12.0
1.0
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
40
111
64
23

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich