56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
18
26
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
6.1
2.2
3.7
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
47
66
34
40
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich