56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Bridgestone Turanza T005 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
16
3
18
33
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#3
#2
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
5.5
3.7
6.1
4.1
3.3
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2023
2025
2024
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
153
34
47
658
40
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Lenkreaktion - trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kraftstoffverbrauch
Firestone Multihawk 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich