56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Falken e.ZiexObere-Mittelklasse
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
13
3
2
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.3
3.3
1.0
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2025
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
123
40
23
34
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich