56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
13
2
3
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
4.3
1.0
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
123
23
40
34
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich