57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
5
4
14
28
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
4.8
3.3
5.5
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
158
40
700
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen