57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Firestone Roadhawk 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 5
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
5
4
28
6
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
#3
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
4.8
3.3
2.3
4.7
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
158
40
68
146

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen