56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
13
3
5
26
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
4.3
3.3
2.2
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
123
40
63
66

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich