57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
13
28
4
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
4.3
2.3
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
123
67
40
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich