57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
4
5
14
28
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
4.8
5.5
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
40
158
700
68

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
77%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Michelin Primacy 5
92%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Michelin Primacy 5
86%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 5
85%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
95%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Michelin Primacy 5
91%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
87%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen