56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Continental SportContact 7

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Continental SportContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

SportContact 7

10.0
R18 – R23
Auch vergleichen mit
PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 S Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
Continental
SportContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
3
1
15
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
1.0
1.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
40
64
122

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Continental SportContact 7
66%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Continental SportContact 7
95%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Continental SportContact 7
79%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Continental SportContact 7
91%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich