56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
3
3
26
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
3.3
3.7
2.2
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
40
34
66
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich