Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

18

4

5

2

3

Optimale Position

#12

#1

#3

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

6.1

12.0

2.2

1.0

3.7

3.3

Neuester Test

2018

2024

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

60

47

111

63

23

34

40

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental UltraContact NXT gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen