57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
5
28
4
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
2.2
2.3
3.3
3.7
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
63
68
40
36
63

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
56%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
63%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Michelin e.Primacy
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Trocken
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kosten
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Komfort
Vertrauensniveau
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen