56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
5
26
3
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
12.0
2.2
2.2
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
111
63
66
40
34

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich