Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Obere-Mittelklasse

Firestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Auch vergleichen mit

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 5

Testprofil

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Anzahl der Tests

1

18

4

3

5

26

3

Optimale Position

#12

#1

#3

#2

#1

#2

Durchschnittliche Position

12.0

6.1

12.0

3.7

2.2

3.3

Neuester Test

2018

2024

2025

2026

Verfügbare Größen

60

47

111

34

63

66

40

Nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

65%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Nassbremsen

Firestone Multihawk 2

74%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Kreisbahn nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Aquaplaning - quer

Firestone Multihawk 2

61%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

73%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Handling - nass

Firestone Multihawk 2

50%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Aquaplaning - längs

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

69%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Trocken

Firestone Multihawk 2

97%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Kosten

Firestone Multihawk 2

73%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

91%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Kilometerstand

Firestone Multihawk 2

72%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

100%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Komfort

Firestone Multihawk 2

75%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Außengeräusch

Firestone Multihawk 2

54%

Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Multihawk 2

Efficient Grip Performance 2

e.Primacy

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

PremiumContact 7

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Nass

Trocken

Kosten

Komfort

Abmessungen und Preise

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen