57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Hankook ION Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
e.Primacy
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
10
4
3
3
1
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#3
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
6.0
12.0
3.3
3.7
1.0
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2026
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
104
111
40
34
64

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich