57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
10
5
13
4
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
6.0
2.2
4.3
3.3
3.7
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2025
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
109
63
123
40
36

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen