56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte
REIFENLAB.CH

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Michelin Primacy 5 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Firestone Multihawk 2Obere-Mittelklasse
FirestoneFirestone

Multihawk 2

R13 – R15
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2Premium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficient Grip Performance 2

7.8
R15 – R20
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 5Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 5

8.4
R16 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

Efficientgrip Performance 2

8.5
R15 – R21
Auch vergleichen mit
PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT Cinturato (C3)

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
ION Evo
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
1
3
3
13
3
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#1
#1
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
1.0
3.3
4.7
4.3
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
64
40
126
123
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Michelin Primacy 4+
85%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich