57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Semperit Speed-Life 3 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Semperit
Speed-Life 3
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
4
14
3
28
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
18.1
3.7
2.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
40
116
36
67

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. the scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
87%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
72%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
74%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
81%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
83%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Semperit Speed-Life 3
76%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen