57 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Fulda EcoControl HP2 gegen Michelin e.Primacy gegen Hankook ION Evo gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Fulda
EcoControl HP2
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
3
8
4
1
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#2
#4
#3
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
3.3
12.8
12.0
1.0
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2026
2024
2025
2025
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
40
30
111
64
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
65%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
63%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
83%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
62%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
73%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
74%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
82%
Michelin e.Primacy
100%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
77%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Fulda EcoControl HP2
76%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich