57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Kumho Ecsta HS52 gegen Michelin Primacy 4+ gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Michelin
Primacy 4+
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
5
10
13
4
3
4
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
2.2
6.0
4.3
3.3
3.7
3.3
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2026
2025
2026
2025
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
63
109
123
40
36
40

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
54%
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Michelin Primacy 4+
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich