56 Shops · 190,948+ Produkte

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
5
3
26
3
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#1
#2
#1
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
2.2
3.7
2.2
3.3
2.2
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2025
2025
2026
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
63
34
66
40
63

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
100%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich