57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
3
4
28
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#2
#2
#1
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
3.7
3.3
2.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2025
2026
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
36
40
68
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen