57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Pirelli
P ZERO PZ4
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
28
3
4
14
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#2
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
2.3
3.7
3.3
5.5
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2026
2025
2026
2025
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
67
36
40
700

Nass

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
83%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
78%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
89%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
68%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
90%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
76%

Trocken

Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%

Kosten

Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
52%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
49%

Komfort

Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
75%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4
77%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich