57 · Produkte}

Vergleich: Firestone Multihawk 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 gegen Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance gegen Continental PremiumContact 7 gegen Falken e.Ziex gegen GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 gegen Hankook Ventus Evo

Testprofil

Firestone
Multihawk 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Anzahl der Tests
1
18
16
28
3
4
5
Optimale Position
#12
#1
#3
#1
#2
#2
#1
Durchschnittliche Position
12.0
6.1
5.5
2.3
3.7
3.3
2.8
Neuester Test
2018
2024
2023
2026
2025
2026
2026
Verfügbare Größen
60
47
153
68
36
40
139

Diese Reifen wurden nicht gemeinsam im selben Test geprüft. Die nachfolgenden Wertungen sind aus verschiedenen unabhängigen Tests zusammengefasst – ein direkter Vergleich sollte daher mit Vorsicht interpretiert werden.

Nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
82%
Hankook Ventus Evo
88%
Handling - nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
50%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - längs
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Nassbremsen
Firestone Multihawk 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
84%
Hankook Ventus Evo
91%
Kreisbahn nass
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
94%
Aquaplaning - quer
Firestone Multihawk 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
77%
Komfort
Firestone Multihawk 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
84%
Außengeräusch
Firestone Multihawk 2
54%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
72%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Innengeräusche
Firestone Multihawk 2
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
79%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Trocken
Firestone Multihawk 2
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
89%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
89%
Kosten
Firestone Multihawk 2
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
74%
Kilometerstand
Firestone Multihawk 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
78%

Abmessungen und Preise

Preise in allen verfügbaren reifendimensionen dieser reifen vergleichen.

Zum Vergleich hinzufügen

Beliebte Marken
Neuer Vergleich

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

LADEN

Reifenlab.ch

Gratis — im App Store

Reifen vergleichen, Testergebnisse lesen und die besten Preise finden — alles in einer App.

Im App Store anzeigen